@cosmicjester

bWS1do can someone translate it from wingnut?

11:11PM Tue, April 20 2010

@dfg77

It proves that the ABC loves Al Qaeda.

11:15PM Tue, April 20 2010

@littlemaths

puzzled me, too. comments suggest it's a leftist corruption of language. this also puzzles me.

11:16PM Tue, April 20 2010

@ozpolitik

You need to read the comments.

11:16PM Tue, April 20 2010

@cosmicjester

by reporting the news?

11:16PM Tue, April 20 2010

@cosmicjester

They are usually bigger fuckwits than Bolt himself though.

11:17PM Tue, April 20 2010

@littlemaths

no wait, i think i get it: they can't have officials, because they're silly terrorists.

11:17PM Tue, April 20 2010

@dfg77

The ABC called the men 'Officials' rather than terr'rists - Obviously the ABC Lefties are trying to give them respectibility.

11:18PM Tue, April 20 2010

@cosmicjester

Well most intelligent people who watch ABC know that Al-Queda is a terrorist organisation. Andrew obviously isnt that smart.

11:18PM Tue, April 20 2010

@ozpolitik

True, and Andy is their fluffer.

11:19PM Tue, April 20 2010

@mjec

I think he's saying Al Qaeda doesn't have officials, it has terrorists?

11:20PM Tue, April 20 2010

@cosmicjester

It was a descriptive word for high up men in the organisation, not just the foot-soldiers. I dont see a problem.

11:21PM Tue, April 20 2010

@cosmicjester

@dfg77 Regardless the actual story did use the word "terrorist". Would andrew only be happy if terrorist is in each sentecne?

11:22PM Tue, April 20 2010

@burwoodgreen

That would have to be one if the most disgusting & offensive thing I have read in a long time!

11:22PM Tue, April 20 2010

@dfg77

There isn't one in reality. In the paranoid fantasy of #LOLBolt commenters it's a sign.

11:23PM Tue, April 20 2010

@LacqueredStudio

Hang on, just how much sway does @senatorsteve have at a COAG meeting?

11:25PM Tue, April 20 2010

@mjec

Andrew Bolt is a schmuck. How is that surprising?

11:32PM Tue, April 20 2010

Anonymous

Replyz collects and amplifies questions from around the web, allowing a wider audience to answer them.

I've read this Andrew Bolt post and cant figure out what he is on about. http://bit.ly/bWS1do can someone translate it from wingnut?

It proves that the ABC loves Al Qaeda.

puzzled me, too. comments suggest it's a leftist corruption of language. this also puzzles me.

You need to read the comments.

by reporting the news?

They are usually bigger fuckwits than Bolt himself though.

no wait, i think i get it: they can't have officials, because they're silly terrorists.

The ABC called the men 'Officials' rather than terr'rists - Obviously the ABC Lefties are trying to give them respectibility.

Well most intelligent people who watch ABC know that Al-Queda is a terrorist organisation. Andrew obviously isnt that smart.

True, and Andy is their fluffer.

I think he's saying Al Qaeda doesn't have officials, it has terrorists?

It was a descriptive word for high up men in the organisation, not just the foot-soldiers. I dont see a problem.

@dfg77 Regardless the actual story did use the word "terrorist". Would andrew only be happy if terrorist is in each sentecne?

That would have to be one if the most disgusting & offensive thing I have read in a long time!

There isn't one in reality. In the paranoid fantasy of #LOLBolt commenters it's a sign.

Hang on, just how much sway does @senatorsteve have at a COAG meeting?

Andrew Bolt is a schmuck. How is that surprising?

Write a Reply

Related Conversations

Topics Like This

Like to reply? Try Flashcards

Get notified when your questions get replies. Track your conversations.

JOIN REPLYZ

Already a Replyz Member?

Connect with Twitter

Replyz collects and amplifies questions from around the web, allowing a wider audience to answer them.

I've read this Andrew Bolt post and cant figure out what he is on about. http://bit.ly/bWS1do can someone translate it from wingnut?

It proves that the ABC loves Al Qaeda.

puzzled me, too. comments suggest it's a leftist corruption of language. this also puzzles me.

You need to read the comments.

by reporting the news?

They are usually bigger fuckwits than Bolt himself though.

no wait, i think i get it: they can't have officials, because they're silly terrorists.

The ABC called the men 'Officials' rather than terr'rists - Obviously the ABC Lefties are trying to give them respectibility.

Well most intelligent people who watch ABC know that Al-Queda is a terrorist organisation. Andrew obviously isnt that smart.

True, and Andy is their fluffer.

I think he's saying Al Qaeda doesn't have officials, it has terrorists?

It was a descriptive word for high up men in the organisation, not just the foot-soldiers. I dont see a problem.

@dfg77 Regardless the actual story did use the word "terrorist". Would andrew only be happy if terrorist is in each sentecne?

That would have to be one if the most disgusting & offensive thing I have read in a long time!

There isn't one in reality. In the paranoid fantasy of #LOLBolt commenters it's a sign.

Hang on, just how much sway does @senatorsteve have at a COAG meeting?

Andrew Bolt is a schmuck. How is that surprising?

Write a Reply

Related Conversations

Topics Like This

Like to reply? Try Flashcards

Ask a question, Start a discussion, Or post anything you want to get replies to.

It’s that simple.

Start a Conversation, Get Replies